home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: comma.rhein.de!serpens!not-for-mail
- From: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: i-net 225 r2 (Re: AT Surfer Package)
- Date: 19 Feb 1996 17:18:11 +0100
- Organization: dis-
- Message-ID: <4ga7s3$8j0@serpens.rhein.de>
- References: <19960210.7CCBF70.8341@ccubb.com> <X> <mbs.48il@adastra.cvl.va.us> <4fr3sj$bp1@reuter.cse.ogi.edu> <4g34ol$i2m@redstone.interpath.net> <4ga380$hvc@newsy.ifm.liu.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: serpens.rhein.de
-
- lilja@tomcat.rydnet.lysator.liu.se (Magnus Lilja) writes:
-
- >In article <4g34ol$i2m@redstone.interpath.net> jamie@jamie.interpath.net (Jim Cooper) writes:
- >> On memory usage, certainly! I-Net 225 only needs about 400K.
-
- >Hmm, only 400K? I have no idea how much AmiTCP is eating, but I doubt (and hope)
- >that it doesn't eat 400K
-
- Actually the memory usage depends a lot on the network usage and load. Starting
- the network with just the inetd and syslogd active eats about 200k for I-Net.
-
- And yes, AmiTCP needs about the same amount of memory.
-
- Regards,
- --
- Michael van Elst
-
- Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-